Research Papers

A Multiple-Domain Matrix Support to Capture Rationale for Engineering Design Changes

[+] Author and Article Information
L. Siddharth

Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bengaluru 560012, India
e-mail: siddharthl@iitrpr.ac.in

Prabir Sarkar

Mechanical Department,
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar,
Rupnagar 140001, India
e-mail: prabir@iitrpr.ac.in

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 26, 2017; final manuscript received March 27, 2018; published online April 26, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Rahul Rai.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 18(2), 021014 (Apr 26, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: JCISE-17-1248; doi: 10.1115/1.4039850 History: Received October 26, 2017; Revised March 27, 2018

Design changes are necessary to sustain the product against competition. Due to technical, social, and financial constraints, an organization can only implement a few of many change alternatives. Hence, a wise selection of a change alternative is fundamentally influential for the growth of the organization. Organizations lack knowledge bases to effectively capture rationale for a design change; i.e., identifying the potential effects a design change. In this paper, (1) we propose a knowledge base called multiple-domain matrix that comprises the relationships among different parameters that are building blocks of a product and its manufacturing system. (2) Using the indirect change propagation method, we capture these relationships to identify the potential effects of a design change. (3) We propose a cost-based metric called change propagation impact (CPI) to quantify the effects that are captured from the multiple-domain matrix. These individual pieces of work are integrated into a web-based tool called Vatram. The tool is deployed in a design environment to evaluate its usefulness and usability.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Sarkar, P. , and Chakrabarti, A. , 2011, “ Assessing Design Creativity,” Des. Stud., 32(4), pp. 348–383. [CrossRef]
Giffin, M. , de Weck, O. , Bounova, G. , Keller, R. , Eckert, C. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2009, “ Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(8), p. 081001. [CrossRef]
Pimmler, T. U. , and Eppinger, S. D. , 1994, Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Ahmad, N. , Wynn, D. C. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2013, “ Change Impact on a Product and Its Redesign Process: A Tool for Knowledge Capture and Reuse,” Res. Eng. Des., 24(3), pp. 219–244. [CrossRef]
Siddharth, L. , and Sarkar, P. , 2017, “ A Methodology for Predicting the Effect of Engineering Design Changes,” Procedia CIRP, 60, pp. 452–457. [CrossRef]
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 2007, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer London.
Bracewell, R. , Wallace, K. , Moss, M. , and Knott, D. , 2009, “ Capturing Design Rationale,” Comput.-Aided Des., 41(3), pp. 173–186. [CrossRef]
Heinrich, H. W. , 1941, Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ishikawa, K. , 1976, Guide to Quality Control, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ferry, T. S. , 1988, Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [CrossRef]
Kunz, W. , and Rittel, H. W. , 1970, Issues as Elements of Information Systems, Vol. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Leveson, N. , 2004, “ A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems,” Saf. Sci., 42(4), pp. 237–270. [CrossRef]
Fenves, S. J. , 2001, Core Product Model for Representing Design Information, U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Bohm, M. R. , Stone, R. B. , and Szykman, S. , 2005, “ Enhancing Virtual Product Representations for Advanced Design Repository Systems,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 5(4), pp. 360–372. [CrossRef]
Murphy, J. , Fu, K. , Otto, K. , Yang, M. , Jensen, D. , and Wood, K. , 2014, “ Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(10), p. 101102. [CrossRef]
Goel, A. K. , Vattam, S. , Wiltgen, B. , and Helms, M. , 2012, “ Cognitive, Collaborative, Conceptual and Creative—Four Characteristics of the Next Generation of Knowledge-Based CAD Systems: A Study in Biologically Inspired Design,” Comput.-Aided Des., 44(10), pp. 879–900. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A. , Siddharth, L. , Dinakar, M. , Panda, M. , Palegar, N. , and Keshwani, S. , 2017, “ Idea-Inspire 3.0—A Tool for Analogical Design,” International Conference on Research Into Design (ICoRD'17), Guwahati, India, Jan. 9–11, p. 10.
Siddharth, L. , Sarkar, P. , and Chakrabarti, A. , 2017, “ Modelling and Structuring the Knowledge of Failures Using Design Structure Matrix (DSM) for Reuse During Product Life-Cycle,” Sixth International Conference on Product Lifecycle Modeling, Simulation and Synthesis (PLMSS), Pune, India, pp. 104–115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321836261_Modelling_and_Structuring_the_Knowledge_of_Failures_using_Design_Structure_Matrix_DSM_for_Reuse_during_Product_Life-Cycle
Steward, D. V. , 1981, “ The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 28(3), pp. 71–74. [CrossRef]
Clarkson, P. J. , Simons, C. , and Eckert, C. , 2004, “ Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design,”ASME J. Mech. Des., 126(5), pp. 788–797. [CrossRef]
Hamraz, B. , Caldwell, N. H. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2013, “ A Matrix-Calculation-Based Algorithm for Numerical Change Propagation Analysis,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 60(1), pp. 186–198. [CrossRef]
Browning, T. R. , 2001, “ Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Management, 48(3), pp. 292–306. [CrossRef]
Wynn, D. C. , Wyatt, D. F. , Nair, S. M. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2010, “ An Introduction to the Cambridge Advanced Modeller,” First International Conference on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes (MMEP), Cambridge, UK, July 19–20. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/243227/10-MMEP10-Wynn-IntroductionToTheCAM.pdf;jsessionid=5B330F206ADD5091E15550F89F762857?sequence=1
Black, J. T. , 1991, The Design of the Factory With a Future, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
Hamraz, B. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2015, “ Industrial Evaluation of FBS Linkage—A Method to Support Engineering Change Management,” J. Eng. Des., 26(1–3), pp. 24–47. [CrossRef]
Shankar, P. , Morkos, B. , and Summers, J. D. , 2012, “ Reasons for Change Propagation: A Case Study in an Automotive OEM,” Res. Eng. Des., 23(4), pp. 291–303. [CrossRef]
Bracewell, R. H. , Ahmed, S. , and Wallace, K. M. , 2004, “ DRed and Design Folders: A Way of Capturing, Storing and Passing on Knowledge Generated During Design Projects,” ASME Paper No. DETC2004-57165.
Gupta, S. , 2017, “ A Framework for Component Selection 2 Based on Multi-Attribute Evaluations,” Research Into Design for Communities, Vol. 2, Springer, Singapore. [CrossRef]
Fantoni, G. , Apreda, R. , Dell'Orletta, F. , and Monge, M. , 2013, “ Automatic Extraction of Function–Behaviour–State Information From Patents,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 27(3), pp. 317–334. [CrossRef]
Sarkar, S. , Dong, A. , Henderson, J. A. , and Robinson, P. , 2014, “ Spectral Characterization of Hierarchical Modularity in Product Architectures,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(1), p. 011006. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Pahl and Beitz [6] design model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Clockwise from top-left: (a) product hierarchy, (b) database structure using adjacency list, and (c) DSM [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Software architecture for Vatram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Indirect change propagation applied in a multiple-domain matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Indirect change propagation method [21]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Direct change propagation method [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The multidomain matrix implemented on Stapler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The web page through change input is given by selecting one of the design parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The representation of impact of a design change

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of impact across three design changes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Adding a manufacturing parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Modifying a design parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Deploying the tool—Vatram in a design environment



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In