Technical Briefs

Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation for Obsolescence Forecasting

[+] Author and Article Information
Liyu Zheng

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Raymond Nelson, III, Peter Sandborn

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742

Janis Terpenny

Department of Industrial and
Manufacturing Systems Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: terpenny@iastate.edu

Sustainment refers to all activities necessary to keep an existing system operational, continue to manufacture and field versions of the system that satisfy the original requirements, or manufacture and field revised versions of the system that satisfy evolving requirements [3].

The sales data is mainly in the form of number of units shipped. If it is not available, sales in market dollars or percentage market share may be used, as long as the total market does not increase appreciably over time [6].

For some products, within the same type of the product, life cycle curves characterized by parameters k, μ, and σ can vary with some primary attributes of the product. Examples are memory chips whose life cycle curves vary with different memory sizes. Memory size is the primary attribute describing the memory chip that evolves over time [6-8]. For these products, if the primary attributes of the product are not considered, the parameters k, μ, and σ obtained from the sales data of the product are only average values for that product.

The time range of the zone of obsolescence can be determined using data mining of historical data (e.g., last-order or last-ship dates) to achieve more accurate obsolescence forecasting [8].

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Application Track Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. Manuscript received February 18, 2011; final manuscript received October 29, 2012; published online December 19, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 13(1), 014501 (Dec 19, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: JCISE-11-1309; doi: 10.1115/1.4023003 History: Received February 18, 2011; Revised October 29, 2012

The impact and pervasiveness of diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages (DMSMS) obsolescence are increasing due to rapidly advancing technologies which shorten the procurement lives of high-tech parts. For long field-life systems, this has led to an increasing disparity in the life cycle of parts as compared to the life cycle of the overall system. This disparity is challenging since obsolescence dates of parts are important to product life cycle planning. While proposed obsolescence forecasting methods have demonstrated some effectiveness, obsolescence management is a continuing challenge since current methods are very difficult to integrate with other tools and lack clear, complete, and consistent information representation. This paper presents an ontology framework to support the needs of knowledge representation for obsolescence forecasting. The formalized obsolescence forecasting method is suitable for products with a life cycle that can be represented with a Gaussian distribution. Classical product life cycle models can be represented using the logic of ontological constructs. The forecasted life cycle curve and zone of obsolescence are obtained by fitting sales data with the Gaussian distribution. Obsolescence is forecasted by executing semantic queries. The knowledge representation for obsolescence forecasting is realized using web ontology language (OWL) and semantic web rule language (SWRL) in the ontology editor Protégé-OWL. A flash memory example is included to demonstrate the obsolescence forecasting procedure. Discussion of future work is included with a focus on extending the ontology beyond the initial representation for obsolescence forecasting to a comprehensive knowledge representation scheme and management system that can facilitate information sharing and collaboration for obsolescence management.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Livingston, H., 2000, “GEB1: Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management Practices,” Proceedings of the DMSMS Conference.
Bumbalough, A., 1999, “USAF Manufacturing Technology's Initiative on Electronics Parts Obsolescence Management,” Proceedings of 44th International SAMPE Symposium, Long Beach, CA, pp. 2044–2051.
Singh, P., and Sandborn, P., 2006, “Obsolescence Driven Design Refresh Planning for Sustainment-Dominated Systems,” Eng. Econ., 51(2), pp. 115–139. [CrossRef]
Henke, A. L., and Lai, S., 1997, “Automated Parts Obsolescence Prediction,” Proceedings of the DMSMS Conference.
Josias, C., and Terpenny, J. P., 2004, “Component Obsolescence Risk Assessment,” Proceedings of the 2004 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (IERC).
Solomon, R., Sandborn, P., and Pecht, M., 2000, “Electronic Part Life Cycle Concepts and Obsolescence Forecasting,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 23(4), pp. 707–717. [CrossRef]
Pecht, M., Solomon, R., Sandborn, P., Wilkinson, C., and Das, D., 2002, Life Cycle Forecasting, Mitigation Assessment and Obsolescence Strategies, CALCE EPSC Press, University of Maryland.
Sandborn, P., Mauro, F., and Knox, R., 2007, “A Data Mining Based Approach to Electronic Part Obsolescence Forecasting,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 30(3), pp. 397–401. [CrossRef]
Meixell, M., and Wu, S. D., 2001, “Scenario Analysis of Demand in a Technology Market Using Leading Indicators,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., 14(1), pp. 65–78. [CrossRef]
DMSMS Knowledge Sharing Portal (KSP), 2011, http://www.dmsms.org/.
Sandborn, P., Jung, R., Wong, R., and Becker, J., 2007, “A Taxonomy and Evaluation Criteria for DMSMS Tools, Databases and Services,” Proceedings of the Aging Aircraft Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
Noy, N. F., and McGuiness, D. L., 2001, “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology,” Stanford Knowledge Systems laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics, Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
Kim, K. Y., Manley, D. G., and Yang, H., 2006, “Ontology-based Assembly Design and Information Sharing for Collaborative Product Development,” Comput.-Aided Des., 38, pp. 1233–1250. [CrossRef]
Chang, X., Sahin, A., and Terpenny, J. P., 2008, “An Ontology-based Support for Product Conceptual Design,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact., 24, pp. 755–762. [CrossRef]
Horridge, M., 2009, “A Practical Guide to Building OWL Ontologies Using Protégé 4 and CO-ODE Tools,” The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
O'Connor, M. J., Knublauch, H., Tu, S. W., and Musen, M. A., 2005, “Writing Rules for the Semantic Web Using SWRL and Jess,” Protégé With Rules Workshop, 8th International Protégé Conference, Madrid, Spain.
Rink, D., and Swan, J., 1979, “Product Life Cycle Research: A literature Review,” J. Bus. Res., 14, pp. 219–242. [CrossRef]
Wolberg, J., 2006, Data Analysis Using the Method of Least Squares: Extracting the Most Information from Experiments, Springer, Berlin.
American Standard ANSI/EIA-724, 1997, “Product Life Cycle Data Model.”
Stogdill, R. C., 1999, “Dealing With Obsolete Parts,” IEEE Des. Test Comput., 16(2), pp. 19–25. [CrossRef]
W3C, 2004, “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML,” http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
Matas, B., and de Suberbasaux, C., 1997, “Memory 1997,” “Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation,” http://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/MEMORY97/SEC05.PDF


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Product life cycle pattern [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Gaussian distribution life cycle curve [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Framework of obsolescence ontologies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SWRL rule for obsolescence forecasting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Flow diagram of obsolescence forecasting for product with Gaussian distribution life cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Description logic for the product life cycle class

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Product life cycle ontology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Description logic for a system class example

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Life cycle curve of the 64 Mbit monolithic flash memory

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Screenshots of the 64 Mbit monolithic flash memory ontology in the Protégé-OWL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Screenshot of the SWRL rule and the result after executing query in the Protégé-OWL



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In