Research Papers

A Study on Module Clustering and Evaluation of Large Gantry Machining Centers

[+] Author and Article Information
Weifang Chen

e-mail: Meewfchen@nuaa.edu.cn

Lijie Cao

e-mail: 15850664351@163.com

Wenhua Ye

e-mail: whye@nuaa.edu.cn
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Precision and
Micro-Manufacturing Technology,
No. 29 Yudao Street,
Nanjing 210016, China;
College of Mechanical and
Electrical Engineering,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics
and Astronautics,
No. 29, Yudao Street,
Nanjing 210016, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. Manuscript received September 14, 2012; final manuscript received February 17, 2013; published online April 22, 2013. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 13(2), 021006 (Apr 22, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: JCISE-12-1155; doi: 10.1115/1.4023861 History: Received September 14, 2012; Revised February 17, 2013

Due to the various requirements of users and large volume of machine tools, most machine tool manufacturers are adopting the small-lot production mode, which largely prolongs the product development cycle. To raise the design efficiency and reduce the complexity, modular design is becoming widely used in serial production of machine tools, especially large gantry machining centers. In this paper, we introduced a function and structure decomposition method to construct the function and structure correlations between components and employed a clustering method based on atomic theory to solve the module clustering problems. The clustering algorithm is modified by integrating the function and structure matrices in order that it applies to modularization of large machine tools. Furthermore, an evaluation method based on the concept of entropy is proposed here to evaluate and optimal select module partition schemes. Finally, we took the large gantry machining center QLMT6300 as an example and compiled the program with Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 to illustrate the validity of the methods proposed. The presented clustering and evaluation method can be easily applied to different machine tools for modular design, reducing the work amount of designers.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bazrov, B. M., 2011, “Modular Design of Machine Tools,” Russ. Eng. Res., 31(11), pp. 1084–1086. [CrossRef]
Jose, A., and Tollenaere, M., 2005, “Modular and Platform Methods for Product Family Design: Literature Analysis,” J. Intell. Manuf., 16(3), pp. 371–390. [CrossRef]
Kusiak, A., and Huang, C.-C., 1996, “Development of Modular Products,” IEEE T. Compon. Pack. T., 19(4), pp. 523–538. [CrossRef]
Huang, C.-C., and Kusiak, A., 1998, “Modularity in Design of Products and Systems,” IEEE T. Syst. Man Cybern., 28(1), pp. 66–77. [CrossRef]
Yu, S., Yang, Q., Tao, J., Tian, X., and Yin, F., 2011, “Product Modular Design Incorporating Life Cycle Issues—Group Genetic Algorithm (GGA) Based Method,” J. Clean. Prod., 19(9–10), pp. 1016–1032. [CrossRef]
Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., and Allamneni, S., 1999, “Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View,” J. Integ. Des. Process Sci., 3(4), pp. 13–26.
Tseng, H., Chang, C., and Li, J., 2008, “Modular Design to Support Green Life-Cycle Engineering,” Expert Syst. Appl., 34(4), pp. 2524–2537. [CrossRef]
Ji, Y.-J., Chen, X.-B., Qi, G.-N., and Song, L.-W., 2012, “Modular Design Involving Effectiveness of Multiple Phases for Product Life Cycle,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol (in press). [CrossRef]
Stone, R., Wood, K., and Crawford, R., 2000, “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures,” Des. Stud., 21(1), pp. 5–31. [CrossRef]
Stone, R., Wood, K., and CrawfordR., 2000, “Using Quantitative Functional Models to Develop Product Architectures,” Des. Stud., 21(3), pp. 239–260. [CrossRef]
Kreng, V. B., and Lee, T.-P., 2004, “Modular Product Design With Grouping Genetic Algorithm—A Case Study,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 46(3), pp. 443–460. [CrossRef]
Pimmler, T. U., and Eppinger, S. D., 1994, “Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions,” ASME, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE,68, pp. 343–351.
Qian, X., and Zhang, H. C., 2003, “Design for Environment: An Environmental Analysis Model for the Modular Design of Products,” IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 114–119.
Guo, W., LiuG. F., and Zhang, L., 2010, “Research on Product's Green Module Partition for Whole Life Cycle,” J. Hefei Univ. Tech., 33(10), pp. 1441–1445, 1449. [CrossRef]
Kuo, T. C., Chang, S. H., and Huang, S., 2006, “Environmentally Conscious Design by Using Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision-Making,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 29(5), pp. 419–425. [CrossRef]
Huang, H. H., Liu, Z. F., Wang, S. W., Liu, G. F., and Guo, W. X., 2006,“Research on Methodology of Modular Design for Recycling,” Trans. Chin. Soc. Ag. Mach., 37(12), pp. 144–149.
Zhu, C., Tang, D., and Zhu, R., 2009, “Product Module Partition Based on Axiomatic Design,” Med Sci. Tech. Aerosp. Eng., 28(7), pp. 926–930.
Gu, P., Hashemian, M., Sosale, S., and Rivin, E., 1997, “An Integrated Modular Design Methodology for Life-Cycle Engineering,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Tech., 46(1), pp. 71–74. [CrossRef]
Gu, P., and Sosale, S., 1999, “Product Modularization for Life Cycle Engineering,” Robot. CIM Int. Manuf., 15(5), pp. 387–401. [CrossRef]
Yu, T., Yassine, A., and Goldberg, D., 2003, “A Genetic Algorithm for Developing Modular Product Architectures,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 3, pp. 515–524.
Smith, S., and Yen, C.-C., 2010, “Green Product Design Through Product Modularization Using Atomic Theory,” Robot. CIM Int. Manuf., 26(6), pp. 790–798. [CrossRef]
Umeda, Y., Fukushige, S., and Tonoike, K., 2009, “Evaluation of Scenario-Based Modularization for Lifecycle Design,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Tech., 58(1), pp. 1–4. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Product function decomposition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Product structure decomposition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Atomic structure and Coulomb's law

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Weight hierarchy of component relations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Structure Diagram of QLMT6300

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Product function and structure decomposition diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Module partition interface



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In