Research Papers

A Process Oriented Hybrid Resource Integration Framework for Product Variant Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Yuliang Li

The State Key Lab of CAD&CG,
Zhejiang University,
38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou,
Zhejiang Province 310027, China
e-mail: lyl_zw@zju.edu.cn

Wei Zhao

Department of Foreign Language,
Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,
18 Xueyuan Street, Hangzhou,
Zhejiang Province 310018, China
e-mail: joycezhaowei@126.com

Lichen Hu

China North Vehicle Research Institute,
Mailbox 969-11,
Beijing 100072, China
e-mail: hulichenluck@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. Manuscript received December 15, 2011; final manuscript received September 19, 2012; published online October 19, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Yoshinobu Kitamura.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 12(4), 041005 (Oct 19, 2012) (14 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007765 History: Received December 15, 2011; Revised September 19, 2012

Design resources such as design tools, knowledge, and data play important roles in the product variant design. The requirements for these resources as well as the resource integration mechanisms are evolving along the life-cycle based product design process. It is expected by designers that not only right design resources but also appropriate integration methods can be found and applied timely to realize design variations efficiently and effectively. In this paper, a hybrid design resource integration framework is proposed based on the design process and resource modeling in order to satisfy the evolutionary requirements for design resources in the process. The integration framework is divided into two levels, namely the abstract integration of virtual resource classes into task templates in the design process modeling and the concrete integration of resource instances into design activities in the design project runs. Based on the two-level integration framework, a hybrid integration mechanism including flexible and stiff integration models and three integration transition methods is proposed to adapt to the from-abstract-to-concrete design evolution process. The system structure and behavior models are given, according to the analysis of integration framework. A hypo-pneumatic spring design case is used to demonstrate the utility of the hybrid integration system. Design results obtained based on the resource integration tool and the traditional manual design approach are compared to assess the tool performance, which shows substantive improvements of design efficiency and efficacy.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Topics: Design , Modeling , Mechanisms
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kusiak, A., 2002, “Integrated Product and Process Design: A Modularity Perspective,” J. Eng. Des., 13(3), pp. 223–231. [CrossRef]
Du, X., Jiao, J., and Tseng, M., 2002, “Product Family Modeling and Design Support: An Approach Based on Graph Rewriting Systems,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 16(2), pp. 103–120. [CrossRef]
Kong, F., Ming, X., Wang, L., Wang, X., and Wang, P., 2009, “On Modular Products Development,” Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl., 17(4), pp. 291–300. [CrossRef]
Simpson, T., Maier, J., and Mistree, F., 2001, “Product Platform Design: Method and Application,” Res. Eng. Des., 13(1), pp. 2–22. [CrossRef]
Jiao, J., Tseng, M., Duffy, V., and Lin, F., 1998, “Product Family Modeling for Mass Customization,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 35(3–4), pp. 495–498. [CrossRef]
Gu, P., and Sosale, S., 1999, “Product Modularization for Life Cycle Engineering,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact., 15(5), pp. 387–401. [CrossRef]
Xu, Q., and Jioa, J., 2009, “Modeling the Design Process of Product Variants With Timed Colored Petri Nets,” J. Mech. Des., 131(6), p. 061009. [CrossRef]
Rezaya, M., 2000, “Knowledge-Based Product Development Using XML and KCs,” Comput.-Aided Des., 32(5–6), pp. 299–309. [CrossRef]
Jiang, J., Xu, X., and Zhou, X., 2008, “Research on the Integration of Resources for Agile Product Design Based on Workflow Management System,” [J. Eng. Graphics, 6(6), pp. 20–26 (in Chinese)].
Fan, Y., 2001, Foundations of Workflow Management Techniques, [ Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, (in Chinese)].
Pahng, F., Senin, N., and Wallace, D., 2000, “Distribution Modeling and Evaluation of Product Design Problems,” Comput.-Aided Des., 32(5–6), pp. 299–309. [CrossRef]
Senin, N., Wallace, D., and Borland, N., 2003, “Distributed Object-Based Modeling in Design Simulation Marketplace,” Trans. ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(1), pp. 2–13. [CrossRef]
Zhao, G., Deng, J., and Shen, W., 2001, “CLOVER: An Agent-Based Approach to Systems Interoperability in Cooperative Design System,” Comput Ind., 45(3), pp. 261–276. [CrossRef]
Whitfield, R., Duffy, A., Cotes, G., and Hills, W., 2002, “Distributed Design Coordination,” Res. Eng. Des., 13(4), pp. 243–252. [CrossRef]
Li, Y., Shao, X., Li, P., and Liu, Q., 2004, “Design and Implementation of a Process Oriented Intelligent Collaborative Product Design System,” Comput Ind., 53(2), pp. 204–229. [CrossRef]
Chen, T., Chen, Y., Chu, H., and Wang, C., 2007, “Development of an Access Control Model, System Architecture and Approaches for Resource Sharing in Virtual Enterprise,” Comput Ind., 58(2), pp. 57–73. [CrossRef]
Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Yong, B., Cochrane, S., and Dani, S., 2007, “An Engineering Design Knowledge Reuse Methodology Using Process Modeling,” Res. Eng. Des., 18(1), pp. 37–48. [CrossRef]
Baxter, D., Roy, R., Doultsinou, D., Gao, J., and Kalta, M., 2009, “A Knowledge Management Framework to Support Product-Service Systems Design,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 22(12), pp. 1073–1088. [CrossRef]
Yin, S., Yin, C., Liu, F., and Guo, K., 2009, “Integrated Service Mechanism of Networked Collaborative Product Development Resources,” [Comput.-Integr. Manuf. Syst., 15(11), pp. 2233–2240 (in Chinese)].
Clarkson, J., and Hamilton, R., 2000, “‘Signposting,’ a Parameter-Driven Task-Based Model of the Design Process,” Res. Eng. Des., 12(1), pp. 18–38. [CrossRef]
Fakas, G., and Karakostas, B., 1999, “A Workflow Management System Based on Intelligent Collaborative Objects,” Inf. Softw. Technol., 41, pp. 907–915. [CrossRef]
Zhan, P., Jayaram, U., Kim, O., and Zhu, L., 2010, “Knowledge Representation and Ontology Mapping Methods for Product Data in Engineering Applications,” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 10(2), p. 021004. [CrossRef]
Chung, J., Kwon, P., and Pentland, B., 2002, “Making Process Visible: A Grammatical Approach to Manage Design Processes,” Trans. ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(3), pp. 364–374. [CrossRef]
Ha, S., and Suh, W., 2008, “A Timed Colored Petri Nets Modeling for Dynamic Workflow in Product Development Process,” Comput. Ind., 59(2–3), pp. 193–209. [CrossRef]
Ryu, K., and Yucesan, E., 2007, “CPM: A Collaborative Process Modeling for Cooperative Manufacturers,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 21(2), pp. 231–239. [CrossRef]
Tan, W., and Fan, Y., 2007, “Dynamic Workflow Model Fragmentation for Distributed Execution,” Comput. Ind., 58(5), pp. 381–391. [CrossRef]
Narendra, N., 2004, “Flexible Support and Management of Adaptive Workflow Processes,” Inf. Syst. Front., 6(3), pp. 247–262. [CrossRef]
Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P., 2004, “Flexible Support of Team Processes by Adaptive Workflow Systems,” Distrib Parallel Dat., 16(1), pp. 91–116. [CrossRef]
Liu, D., and Shen, M., 2003, “Workflow Modeling for Virtual Processes: An Order-Preserving Process-View Approach,” Inf. Syst., 28(6), pp. 505–532. [CrossRef]
Shiau, Y., and Wee, M., 2008, “A Distributed Change Control Workflow for Collaborative Design Network,” Comput Ind., 59(2–3), pp. 119–127. [CrossRef]
Wang, H., Yang, J., and Ceglarek, J., 2009, “A Graph-Based Data Structure for Assembly Dimensional Variation Control at a Preliminary Phase of Product Design,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 22(10), pp. 948–961. [CrossRef]
Ajaefobi, J., Weston, R., Wahid, B., and Rahimifard, A., 2010, “Integrated Approach to Modeling Human Systems as Reusable Components of Manufacturing Workplaces,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 23(3), pp. 195–215. [CrossRef]
Sundgren, N., 1999, “Introducing Interface Management in New Product Family Development,” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 16, pp. 40–51. [CrossRef]
Chang, S., Ho, H., and Yuan, M., 2001, “A Unified Interface for Integrating Information Retrieval,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 23, pp. 325–340. [CrossRef]
Xue, D., Yang, H., and Tu, J., 2006, “Modeling of Evolutionary Design Database,” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 6(1), pp. 22–32. [CrossRef]
Ullman, D., 2003, The Mechanical Design Process, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hayes, C., Goel, A., Tumer, I., Agogino, A., and Regli, W., 2011, “Intelligent Support for Product Design: Looking Backward, Looking Forward,” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 11(2), p. 021007. [CrossRef]
Li, Y., Zhao, W., and Ma, Y., 2011, “A Strategy for Resolving Evolutionary Performance Coupling at the Early Stages of Complex Engineering Design,” J. Eng. Des., 22(9), pp. 603–626. [CrossRef]
Cadman, J., and Corry, C., 1998, Waite Group's COM/DCOM Primer Plus, Pearson, Toronto.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The overall research approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Task input and output logics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Reducer model (a) and some task dependence logics (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Design activity model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Different evolution paths contained in a product design process template

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Classification of design resources

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Tool resource representation examples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The hybrid representation model for the knowledge (model) resource

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Parameter-driven object resource integration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Two-level design resource integration mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The meta-models for the hybrid design resource integration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The system function model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The system behavior model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The design process model of hypo-pneumatic spring and the model resource search and interface match setups for the design task—analyses of displacement and velocity characteristics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Information related to “Analyses of Displacement and Velocity” task besides the abstract resource integration shown in Fig. 15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Design resource invocations for the same task node with different task contents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Four kinds of hypo-pneumatic springs used in the suspension systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Comparison of design efficiency and design results for designers completing projects with and without software



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In