Research Papers

In Search of Design Inspiration: A Semantic-Based Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Rossitza Setchi

School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UKsetchi@cf.ac.uk

Carole Bouchard

Laboratory of New Product Design and Innovation, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Métiers, 75013 Paris, Francecarole.bouchard@paris.ensam.fr

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 10(3), 031006 (Sep 03, 2010) (23 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3482061 History: Received July 31, 2009; Revised July 07, 2010; Published September 03, 2010; Online September 03, 2010

Sources of inspiration help designers to define the context of their designs and reflect on the emotional impact of their new products. By observing and interpreting sources of inspiration, designers form vocabularies of terms, pallets of colors, or mood boards with images, which express their feelings, inspire their creativity and help them communicate design concepts. These ideas are the motivation behind the EU-funded project TRENDS, which aimed at developing a software tool that supports the inspirational stage of design by providing designers of concept cars with various sources of inspiration. This paper concentrates on OntoTag, the semantic-based image retrieval algorithm developed within the TRENDS project, and its evaluation. OntoTag uses concepts from a general-purpose lexical ontology called OntoRo, and semantic adjectives from a domain-specific ontology for designers called CTA, to index the images in the TRENDS database in a way which provides designers with a degree of serendipity and stimulates their creativity. The semantic-based algorithm involves the following four steps: (i) creating a collection of documents and images retrieved from the web, (ii) for each document, identifying the most frequently used keywords and phrases in the text around the image, (iii) identifying the most powerful concepts represented in each document, and (iv) ranking the concepts identified and linking them to the images in the collection. OntoTag differs significantly from earlier approaches as it does not rely on machine learning and the availability of tagged corpuses. Its main innovation is in the use of the words’ monosemy and polysemy as a measure of their probability to belong to a certain concept. The proposed approach is illustrated with examples based on the software tool developed for the needs of two of the industrial collaborators involved in the TRENDS project.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Two trend boards created using conjoint trends analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

OpenCyc, WordNet and OntoRo: a comparative example

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Example illustrating the ontology tagging algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Using semantic search to create a color pallet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

OntoTag evaluation (example page 9.html, its concept tags, and their weighting, as generated by OntoTag)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

OntoTag evaluation: semantic search for aggressive

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

User-centered evaluation: materials, evaluation sheet, and results (TRENDS, 2010)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In