Ontologies for Supporting Engineering Design Optimization

[+] Author and Article Information
Paul Witherell

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003pww@student.umass.edu

Sundar Krishnamurty

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003skrishna@ecs.umass.edu

Ian R. Grosse

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003grosse@ecs.umass.edu

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 7(2), 141-150 (Nov 09, 2006) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2720882 History: Received January 10, 2006; Revised November 09, 2006

This paper presents an optimization ontology and its implementation into a prototype computational knowledge-based tool dubbed ONTOP (ontology for optimization). Salient feature of ONTOP include a knowledge base that incorporates both standardized optimization terminology, formal method definitions, and often unrecorded optimization details, such as any idealizations and assumptions that may be made when creating an optimization model, as well as the model developer’s rationale and justification behind these idealizations and assumptions. ONTOP was developed using Protégé, a Java-based, free open-source ontology development environment created by Stanford University. Two engineering design optimization case studies are presented. The first case study consists of the optimization of a structural beam element and demonstrates ONTOP ’s ability to address the variations in an optimal solution that may arise when different techniques and approaches are used. A second case study, a more complex design problem that deals with the optimization of an impeller of a pediatric left ventricular heart assist device, demonstrates the wealth of knowledge ONTOP is able to capture. Together, these test beds help illustrate the potential value of an ontology in representing application-specific knowledge while facilitating both the sharing and exchanging of this knowledge in engineering design optimization.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Diagram of optimization types

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Flowchart of engineering design optimization process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Slots used to define optimization model class when input in protégé

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Protégé ontology of optimization types

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Classic I-beam optimization problem, minimize volume by reducing cross-section

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

I-beam optimization models in optimization ontology

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

CAD model of PVAD impeller

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Screenshot of application of optimization ontology (knowledge captured of CAD model to be optimized)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Representation of multiple optimization models in ONTOP test bed, with one instance expanded



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In