A Collaborative Framework for Integrated Part and Assembly Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Rafael Bidarra, Niels Kranendonk, Alex Noort

Willem F. Bronsvoort

Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, The Netherlandshttp://graphics.tudelft.nl (Bidarra/Noort/Bronsvoort)@its.tudelft.nl

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 2(4), 256-264 (Mar 26, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1555647 History: Received September 01, 2002; Revised January 01, 2003; Online March 26, 2003
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Topics: Design , Modeling , Teams
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Noort,  A., Hoek,  G. F. M., and Bronsvoort,  W. F., 2002, “Integrating Part and Assembly Modelling,” Comput.-Aided Des., 34(12), pp. 899–912.
Bullinger, H.-J., and Warschat, J., 1996, Concurrent Simultaneous Engineering Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Deneux,  D., 1999, “Introduction to Assembly Features: an Illustrated Synthesis Methodology,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 10(1), pp. 29–39.
Heisserman, J., and Mattikalli, R., 1998, “Representing Relationships in Hierarchical Assemblies,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, ASME, New York.
van Holland,  W., and Bronsvoort,  W. F., 2000, “Assembly Features in Modeling and Planning,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact., 16(4), pp. 277–294.
Whitney, D. E., and Mantripragada, R., 1998, “The Datum Flow Chain: A Systematic Approach to Assembly Design and Modeling,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, ASME, New York.
Bronsvoort,  W. F., Bidarra,  R., and Noort,  A., 2002, “Feature Model Visualization,” Computer Graphics Forum, 21(4), pp. 661–673.
Bidarra,  R., and Bronsvoort,  W. F., 2000, “Semantic Feature Modelling,” Comput.-Aided Des., 32(3), pp. 201–225.
de Kraker, K. J., Dohmen, M., and Bronsvoort, W. F., 1997, “Maintaining Multiple Views in Feature Modeling,” Proceedings of Solid Modeling ’97-Fourth Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, Hoffmann, C. M. and Bronsvoort, W. F. (Eds.), ACM Press, New York, pp. 123–130.
Bidarra,  R., van den Berg,  E., and Bronsvoort,  W. F., 2002, “A Collaborative Feature Modeling System,” J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2(3), pp. 192–198. See also: http://www.webSPIFF.org
Kaon, 2001, HyperSpace-3DForum. Kaon Interactive Inc., Cambridge, MA. http://www.kaon.com
WebEx, 2002, WebEx Meeting Center. WebEx Communications Inc., San Jose, CA. http://www.webex.com
Parametric, 2001 Pro/ENGINEER 2001i. Parametric Technologies Corporation, Waltham, MA. http://www.ptc.com
SDRC, 2001, I-DEAS. SDRC, Milford, OH. http://www.sdrc.com
Nam, T. J., and Wright, D. K., 1998, CollIDE: “A Shared 3D Workspace for CAD,” Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on Network Entities, Leeds.
Stork, A., and Jasnoch, U., 1997, “A Collaborative Engineering Environment,” Proceedings of TeamCAD ’97 Workshop on Collaborative Design, Atlanta, GA, pp. 25–33.
Lee, J. Y., Kim, H., Han, S. B., and Park, S. B., 1999, “Network-centric Feature-based Modeling,” Proceedings of Pacific Graphics ’99, Kim, M.-S. and Seidel, H.-P. (Eds.), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 280–289.
Shyamsundar,  N., and Gadh,  R., 2001, “Internet-based Collaborative Product Design with Assembly Features and Virtual Design Spaces,” Comput.-Aided Des., 33(9), pp. 637–651.
CoCreate, 2002, One Space Suite Solution. CoCreate Software, Inc., Fort Collins, CO. http://www.cocreate.com
Valin, V., Francu, A., Trefftz, H., and Marsic, I., 2001, “Sharing Viewpoints in Collaborative Virtual Environments,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii.


Grahic Jump Location
Geometry camera windows for detail design view (a) and manufacturing planning view (b) on a part
Grahic Jump Location
Windows of a geometry camera for a table model (a), and a hierarchical graph camera for the table assembly (b)
Grahic Jump Location
If a detail design view on a part (a) and the assembly design view on the related component (b) become inconsistent because a form feature for a connection feature is added to the component (c), then the feature model of the part is updated accordingly (d). The resulting invalid feature model of the part is made valid again by reducing the height of the passage (e), thus increasing the distance between the passage and the new form feature, and the reference geometry of the component is updated accordingly (f ).
Grahic Jump Location
A simplified hierarchical product structure of a bicycle
Grahic Jump Location
Product structuring and task assignment: new product structure (a), specification of a single component (b), specification of a compound component (c), and final product structure (d)
Grahic Jump Location
Shared cameras of two team members with different views on the same part
Grahic Jump Location
Collaborative validity maintenance
Grahic Jump Location
Three components (a) are connected into the front fork assembly of a bicycle (b), of which the crown part is subsequently adjusted to make room for the front wheel (c)
Grahic Jump Location
Top-down specification using the Product Navigator
Grahic Jump Location
Final task assignment for the fully specified product
Grahic Jump Location
Collaboration between users B and D, for matching leg top and transmission box dimensions
Grahic Jump Location
User B establishes a connection between two table leg parts
Grahic Jump Location
Final mechanism components, designed by user D



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In