0
Research Papers

Efficient Compliant Variation Simulation of Spot-Welded Assemblies

[+] Author and Article Information
Samuel Lorin

Computational Engineering and Design,
Fraunhofer Chalmers Centre,
Gothenburg SE-412 58, Sweden
e-mail: samuel.lorin@fcc.chalmers.se

Björn Lindau

81710, ME - Core Geometry,
Volvo Car Corporation,
Gothenburg SE-405 31, Sweden

Lars Lindkvist, Rikard Söderberg

Department of Industrial and Materials Science,
Chalmers University of Technology,
Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 7, 2018; final manuscript received October 1, 2018; published online November 19, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Charlie C. L. Wang.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 19(1), 011007 (Nov 19, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: JCISE-18-1117; doi: 10.1115/1.4041706 History: Received May 07, 2018; Revised October 01, 2018

During product development one important aspect is the geometric robustness of the design. This is due to the fact that all manufacturing processes lead to products with variation. Failing to properly account for the variability of the process in the design phase may lead to expensive redesign. One important tool during the design phase in many industries is variation simulation, which makes it possible to predict and optimize the geometric quality of the design. However, despite the increase in computer power, calculation time is still an obstacle for the wider use of variation simulation. In this article, we propose a new method for efficient compliant variation simulation of spot-welded sheet metal assemblies. The method is exact, and we show that the method leads to time savings in simulation of approximately 40–50% compared to current state-of-the-art variation simulation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Söderberg, R. , Lindkvist, L. , Wärmefjord, K. , and Carlson, J. S. , 2016, “ Virtual Geometry Assurance Process and Toolbox,” Procedia CIRP, 43, pp. 3–12. [CrossRef]
Lindau, B. , Rosenqvist, M. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2015, “ Challenges Moving From Physical Into Virtual Verification of Sheet Metal Assemblies,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2015-51024.
Wickman, C. , 2005, Visualising the Effect of Geometrical Variation in Assembled Products. Predicting Visual Quality Appearance, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Forslund, K. , 2009, Visual Robustness: Effects of Variation on Product Appearance and Perceived Quality, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Phadke, M. S. , 1995, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Liu, S. C. , and Hu, S. J. , 1997, “ Variation Simulation for Deformable Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Finite Element Methods,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 119(3), pp. 368–374. [CrossRef]
Dahlström, S. , 2005, Variation Simulation of Sheet Metal Assemblies for Geometrical Quality: Parameter Modeling and Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Wärmefjord, K. , 2011, Variation Control in Virtual Product Realization-A Statistical Approach, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Segeborn, J. , 2011, Cost-Effective Sheet Metal Assembly by Automatic Path Planning and Line Balancing, Integrated With Dimensional Variation Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nagy-Sochacki, J. , 2016, “ Robust Dimensional Variation Control of Compliant Assemblies Through the Application of Sheet Metal Joining Process Sequencing,” The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Lindau, B. , Lindkvist, L. , Andersson, A. , and Söderberg, R. , 2013, “ Statistical Shape Modeling in Virtual Assembly Using PCA-Technique,” J. Manuf. Syst., 32(3), pp. 456–463. [CrossRef]
Wärmefjord, K. , Söderberg, R. , and Lindkvist, L. , 2010, “ Strategies for Optimization of Spot Welding Sequence With Respect to Geometrical Variation in Sheet Metal Assemblies,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2010-38471.
Larsson, S. , and Thomée, V. , 2008, Partial Differential Equations With Numerical Methods, Vol. 45, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
Dahlström, S. , and Lindkvist, L. , 2007, “ Variation Simulation of Sheet Metal Assemblies Using the Method of Influence Coefficients With Contact Modeling,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(3), pp. 615–622. [CrossRef]
Xie, K. , Wells, L. , Camelio, J. A. , and Youn, B. D. , 2007, “ Variation Propagation Analysis on Compliant Assemblies Considering Contact Interaction,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(5), pp. 934–942. [CrossRef]
Wärmefjord, K. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2008, “ Tolerance Simulation of Compliant Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Automatic Node-Based Contact Detection,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2008-66344.
Ungemach, G. , and Mantwill, F. , 2009, “ Efficient Consideration of Contact in Compliant Assembly Variation Analysis,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 131(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Lindau, B. , Lorin, S. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2016, “ Efficient Contact Modeling in Nonrigid Variation Simulation,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 16(1), p. 011002. [CrossRef]
Lorin, S. , Lindau, B. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2017, “ Non-Rigid Variation Simulation Using the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury Formulas,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2017-71456.
Hager, W. W. , 1989, “ Updating the Inverse of a Matrix,” SIAM Rev., 31(2), pp. 221–239. [CrossRef]
Akgün, M. A. , Garcelon, J. H. , and Haftka, R. T. , 2001, “ Fast Exact Linear and Non-Linear Structural Reanalysis and the Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury Formulas,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 50(7), pp. 1587–1606. [CrossRef]
RD&T Technology AB, 2017, “ RD&T Software Manual,” RDT Technology AB, Mölndal, Sweden, accessed Oct 19, 2018, http://www.rdnt.se
Kirsch, U. , 2010, “ Reanalysis and Sensitivity Reanalysis by Combined Approximations,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 40(1–6), pp. 1–15. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry assurance [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

To the left, a part is forced into position by a clamp (in gray, from above and below). To the right is a cross section of what is happening. The shape before clamping is shown in orange, green shows the clamped position of the non-nominal part and the clamps are shown in gray.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Case 1: the red arrows indicate the positioning system (A1–A3, B1, B2, and C3), the orange arrows are support points (S1, …, S17) and the gray dots are weld point pairs (W1, …, W11)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Case 2 with positioning system (A1–A3, B1, B2, and C3), support points (S1, …, S17) and weld point pairs (W1, …, W12)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Case 3 with positioning system (A1–A3, B1, B2, and C3), support points (S1, …, S14)

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In