Research Papers

Toward the Effect of Dependent Distribution Parameters on Reliability Prediction

[+] Author and Article Information
Yao Cheng

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Missouri University of Science and Technology,
258A Toomey Hall, 400 West 13th Street,
Rolla, MO 65409-0500
e-mail: ycbm7@mst.edu

Xiaoping Du

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Missouri University of Science and Technology,
272 Toomey Hall, 400 West 13th Street,
Rolla, MO 65409-0500
e-mail: dux@mst.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 7, 2017; final manuscript received January 22, 2018; published online March 19, 2018. Editor: Satyandra K. Gupta.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 18(2), 021008 (Mar 19, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: JCISE-17-1211; doi: 10.1115/1.4039193 History: Received October 07, 2017; Revised January 22, 2018

Random variables are commonly encountered in engineering applications, and their distributions are required for analysis and design, especially for reliability prediction during the design process. Distribution parameters are usually estimated using samples. In many applications, samples are in the form of intervals, and the estimated distribution parameters will also be in intervals. Traditional reliability methodologies assume independent interval distribution parameters, but as shown in this study, the parameters are actually dependent since they are estimated from the same set of samples. This study investigates the effect of the dependence of distribution parameters on the accuracy of reliability analysis results. The major approach is numerical simulation and optimization. This study demonstrates that the independent distribution parameter assumption makes the estimated reliability bounds wider than the true bounds. The reason is that the actual combination of the distribution parameters may not include the entire box-type domain assumed by the independent interval parameter assumption. The results of this study not only reveal the cause of the imprecision of the independent distribution parameter assumption, but also demonstrate a need of developing new reliability methods to accommodate dependent distribution parameters.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Coleman, H. W. , and Steele, W. G. , 2009, Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [CrossRef]
Nikolaidis, E. , Ghiocel, D. M. , and Singhal, S. , eds., 2004, Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [CrossRef]
Robert, E. M. , 1999, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Zang, T. A. , Hemsch, M. J. , Hilburger, M. W. , Kenny, S. P. , Luckring, J. M. , Maghami, P. , Padula, S. L. , and Stroud, W. J. , 2002, “Needs and Opportunities for Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Methods for Aerospace Vehicles,” NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Technical Report No. NASA/TM-2002-211462. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20020063596
Qiu, Z. , and Wang, J. , 2010, “ The Interval Estimation of Reliability for Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Hybrid Structural System,” Eng. Failure Anal., 17(5), pp. 1142–1154. [CrossRef]
Xiao, N. C. , Huang, H. Z. , Wang, Z. , Pang, Y. , and He, L. , 2011, “ Reliability Sensitivity Analysis for Structural Systems in Interval Probability Form,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 44(5), pp. 691–705. [CrossRef]
Du, X. , Sudjianto, A. , and Huang, B. , 2005, “ Reliability-Based Design With the Mixture of Random and Interval Variables,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(6), pp. 1068–1076. [CrossRef]
Der Kiureghian, A. , 2005, “ First- and Second-Order Reliability Methods,” Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 11–14.
Halpern, E. F. , Weinstein, M. C. , Hunink, M. G. , and Gazelle, G. S. , 2000, “ Representing Both First-and Second-Order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of Patients,” Med. Decis. Making, 20(3), pp. 314–322. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hajagos, J. G. , 2007, “ Interval Monte Carlo as an Alternative to Second-Order Sampling for Estimating Ecological Risk,” Reliab. Comput., 13(1), pp. 71–81. [CrossRef]
Xie, S. , Pan, B. , and Du, X. , 2015, “ A Single-Loop Optimization Method for Reliability Analysis With Second Order Uncertainty,” Eng. Optim., 47(8), pp. 1125–1139. [CrossRef]
Guo, J. , and Du, X. , 2009, “ Reliability Sensitivity Analysis With Random and Interval Variables,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 78(13), pp. 1585–1617. [CrossRef]
Guo, J. , and Du, X. , 2010, “ Reliability Analysis for Multidisciplinary Systems With Random and Interval Variables,” AIAA J., 48(1), pp. 82–91. [CrossRef]
Hu, Z. , and Du, X. , 2015, “ A Random Field Approach to Reliability Analysis With Random and Interval Variables,” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part B, 1(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Zaman, K. , McDonald, M. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2011, “ Probabilistic Framework for Uncertainty Propagation With Both Probabilistic and Interval Variables,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(2), p. 021010. [CrossRef]
Xie, S. , Pan, B. , and Du, X. , 2016, “ An Efficient Hybrid Reliability Analysis Method With Random and Interval Variables,” Eng. Optim., 48(9), pp. 1459–1473. [CrossRef]
Kiureghian, A. D. , 1989, “ Measures of Structural Safety Under Imperfect States of Knowledge,” J. Struct. Eng., 115(5), pp. 1119–1140. [CrossRef]
Elishakoff, I. , and Colombi, P. , 1993, “ Combination of Probabilistic and Convex Models of Uncertainty When Scarce Knowledge is Present on Acoustic Excitation Parameters,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 104(2), pp. 187–209. [CrossRef]
Zhu, L. P. , and Elishakoff, I. , 1996, “ Hybrid Probabilistic and Convex Modeling of Excitation and Response of Periodic Structures,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2(2), pp. 143–163. [CrossRef]
Qiu, Z. , Yang, D. , and Elishakoff, I. , 2008, “ Probabilistic Interval Reliability of Structural Systems,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 45(10), pp. 2850–2860. [CrossRef]
Jiang, C. , Han, X. , Li, W. X. , Liu, J. , and Zhang, Z. , 2012, “ A Hybrid Reliability Approach Based on Probability and Interval for Uncertain Structures,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Sankararaman, S. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2013, “ Separating the Contributions of Variability and Parameter Uncertainty in Probability Distributions,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 112, pp. 187–199. [CrossRef]
Fisher, R. A. , 1921, “ On the ‘Probable Error’ of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced From a Small Sample,” Metron, 1, pp. 3–32. https://hekyll.services.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/15169/1/14.pdf
Fisher, R. A. , 1922, “ On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 222(594–604), pp. 309–368. [CrossRef]
Gentleman, R. , and Geyer, C. J. , 1994, “ Maximum Likelihood for Interval Censored Data: Consistency and Computation,” Biometrika, 81(3), pp. 618–623. [CrossRef]
Sankararaman, S. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2011, “ Likelihood-Based Representation of Epistemic Uncertainty Due to Sparse Point Data and/or Interval Data,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(7), pp. 814–824. [CrossRef]
Cheng, Y. , and Du, X. , 2016, “ System Reliability Analysis With Dependent Component Failures During Early Design Stage—A Feasibility Study,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 138(5), p. 051405. [CrossRef]
Sudret, B. , and Marelli, S. , 2015, “Polynomial Chaos Expansions for Structural Reliability Analysis,” ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, accessed Jan. 22, 2018, http://www.gst-mi.fr/Coppermine/albums/userpics/10005/Sudret-final.pdf


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Box domain of the mean and standard deviation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Distribution parameters with six interval samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dependent relationship between distribution parameters with different number of intervals: (a) 1 interval, (b) 2 intervals, (c) 3 intervals, (d) 4 intervals, (e) 5 intervals, (f) 7 intervals, (g) 8 intervals, and (h) 9 intervals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A bending stress applied on a beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Probability of failure with respect to the number of interval samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dependent distribution parameters of Sy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A load applied to a simply supported beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dependent distribution parameters of E

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Dependent distribution parameters of p

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

A cantilever tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dependent mean and standard deviation of F1




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In