0
Research Papers

Energy-Aware Material Selection for Product With Multicomponent Under Cloud Environment

[+] Author and Article Information
Luning Bi, Ying Zuo, Zhuqing Liu

School of Automation Science and
Electrical Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China

Fei Tao

School of Automation Science and
Electrical Engineering,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: ftao@buaa.edu.cn

T. W. Liao

Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 19, 2016; final manuscript received December 23, 2016; published online February 16, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Jitesh H. Panchal.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 17(3), 031007 (Feb 16, 2017) (14 pages) Paper No: JCISE-16-1773; doi: 10.1115/1.4035675 History: Received February 19, 2016; Revised December 23, 2016

Energy consumption in manufacturing has risen to be a global concern. Material selection in the product design phase is of great significance to energy conservation and emission reduction. However, because of the limitation of the current life-cycle energy analysis and optimization method, such concerns have not been adequately addressed in material selection. To fill in this gap, a process to build a comprehensive multi-objective optimization model for automated multimaterial selection (MOO–MSS) on the basis of cloud manufacturing is developed in this paper. The optimizing method, named local search-differential group leader algorithm (LS-DGLA), is a hybrid of differential evolution and local search with the group leader algorithm (GLA), constructed for better flexibility to handle different needs for various product designs. Compared with a number of evolutionary algorithms and nonevolutionary algorithms, it is observed that LS-DGLA performs better in terms of speed, stability, and searching capability.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Life-cycle energy analysis of different materials in BIW design (source: adapted from Ref. [11])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Framework of the MOO–MMS problem in a cloud manufacturing system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Transformation between requirements and constraints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flowchart for the proposed LS-DGLA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Population initialization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Strategy of local search

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Parameter transfer from other groups

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Experimental verification of the LS-DGLA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Average fitness with different number of candidate materials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison among GA, DE, PSO, ABCA, COA, and LS-DGLA

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In