0
Research Papers

Enriching STEP Product Model With Geometric Dimension and Tolerance Information for One-Dimensional Tolerance Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Mehmet I. Sarigecili

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Cukurova University,
Saricam, Adana 01330, Turkey
e-mail: msarigecili@cu.edu.tr

Utpal Roy

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
Syracuse University,
Syracuse, NY 13244
e-mail: uroy@syr.edu

Sudarsan Rachuri

Mem. ASME
Department of Energy,
Advanced Manufacturing Office,
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy (EERE),
Washington, DC 20585
e-mail: Sudarsan.Rachuri@ee.doe.gov

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 17, 2012; final manuscript received November 14, 2016; published online February 16, 2017. Editor: Bahram Ravani.This work is in part a work of the U.S. Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the U.S. Government's contributions.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 17(2), 021004 (Feb 16, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: JCISE-12-1137; doi: 10.1115/1.4035269 History: Received August 17, 2012; Revised November 14, 2016

Information exchange and sharing become a necessity for digital factory but they have been more challenging as the industry is computerized more. This is mainly because the capabilities of computerized systems have grown significantly in a very rapid pace in their own information structure, and they require to retrieve various data from different computer systems. ISO 10303–STEP has been developed to provide a neutral format for exchanging product data. However, implementation of STEP has several issues, including the following two: (1) the complete STEP file should be processed even for querying a small set of data, and (2) information required for realizing any functional activity (e.g., any analysis on any part of a product) is not explicitly identified. Hence, in this study, functionality-based conformance classes (FCCs) are developed to organize the current conformance classes (CCs) (which are the classes required to be implemented fully in order to be conformant to any particular STEP standard) for supporting different functional activities. Following the concept of data exchange specification (DEX)/template, several templates that are repeatedly used small information groups are introduced in order to create manageable sets of data constructs. In this study, the FCCs for 1D tolerance analysis are developed by enriching the available STEP information models with GD&T. The use of extended STEP models is illustrated with a case study.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

ISO, 1994, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-1:1994.
ISO, 1994, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 203: Application Protocol: Configuration Controlled 3D Designs of Mechanical Parts and Assemblies,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-203:1994.
ISO, 1994, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 11: Description Methods: The EXPRESS Language Reference,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-11: 1994.
Sarigecili, M. I. , Roy, U. , Rachuri, S. , and Sriram, R. D. , 2009, “ Development of Functionality-Based Conformance Classes for ISO 10303: Conformance Classes for Tolerancing Functionality,” Comput.-Aided Des. Appl., 6(2), pp. 167–179.
Barnard Feeney, A. , 2002, “ The STEP Modular Architecture,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 2(2), pp. 132–135. [CrossRef]
ISO, 2005, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 203: Application Protocol: Configuration Controlled 3D Designs of Mechanical Parts and Assemblies (Modular Version),” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-203:2005.
ISO, 2005, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—AP 239: Product Life Cycle Support,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-239: 2005.
OASIS, 2016, Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, Burlington, MA.
Xie, S. Q. , Yang, W. Z. , and Tu, Y. L. , 2008, “ Towards a Generic Product Modelling Framework,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 46(8), pp. 2229–2254. [CrossRef]
Shaharoun, A. M. , Ab Razak, J. , and Alam, M. R. , 1998, “ A STEP-Based Geometrical Representation as Part of Product Data Model of a Plastics Part,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 76(1–3), pp. 115–119. [CrossRef]
Sharma, R. , and Gao, J. X. , 2002, “ Implementation of STEP 224 in an Automatic Manufacturing Planning System,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 216(9), pp. 1277–1289. [CrossRef]
Zha, X. F. , and Du, H. , 2002, “ A PDES/STEP-Based Model and System for Concurrent Integrated Design and Assembly Planning,” Comput. Aided Des., 34(14), pp. 1087–1110. [CrossRef]
Barreiro, J. , Labarga, J. E. , Vizan, A. , and Rios, J. , 2003, “ Information Model for the Integration of Inspection Activity in a Concurrent Engineering Framework,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 43(8), pp. 797–809. [CrossRef]
Liang, J. , Shah, J. J. , D'Souza, R. , Urban, S. D. , Ayyaswamy, K. , Harter, E. , and Bluhm, T. , 1999, “ Synthesis of Consolidated Data Schema for Engineering Analysis From Multiple STEP Application Protocols,” Comput.-Aided Des., 31(7), pp. 429–447. [CrossRef]
Feeney, A. , Frechette, S. P. , and Srinivasan, V. , 2015, “ A Portrait of an ISO STEP Tolerancing Standard as an Enabler of Smart Manufacturing Systems,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 15(2), p. 021001. [CrossRef]
Hedberg, T., Jr. , Lubell, J. , Fischer, L. , Maggiano, L. , and Barnard Feeney, A. , 2016, “ Testing the Digital Thread in Support of Model-Based Manufacturing and Inspection,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 16(2), p. 021001. [CrossRef]
Shen, Z. , Ameta, G. , Shah, J. J. , and Davidson, J. K. , 2005, “ A Comparative Study of Tolerance Analysis Methods,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 5(3), pp. 247–256. [CrossRef]
Fischer, B. R. , 2004, Mechanical Tolerance Stackup and Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Sarigecili, M. I. , 2012, “ Enriching Step-Based Product Information Models to Support Product Life-Cycle Activities,” Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
ISO, 1994, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 47: Integrated Generic Resources: Shape Variation Tolerances,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-47: 1994.
ISO, 2004, “ Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 109: Integrated Application Resource: Kinematic and Geometric Constraints for Assembly Models,” International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 10303-109: 2004.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The stack-up analysis details for complex assembly [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Information layers for tolerance analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Modified assembly constraint representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Representation of the dimension_loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Representation of the dimensional_variation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Representation of the nominal_dimension

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Representation of the converted_geometric_tolerance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Representation of the virtual condition boundary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Representation of the bonus_tolerance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Representation of the datum_feature_shift

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Representation of the assembly_shift

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Representation of the tolerance_analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Representation of the linear_tol_analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Shape aspect data instance representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Framework for implementation of FCC-tolerance analysis

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In