0
Research Papers

Simulation of Laser-Induced Controlled Fracturing Utilizing a Phase Field Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexander Schlüter

Institute of Applied Mechanics
and Computational Mechanics,
University of Kaiserslautern,
P.O. Box 3049,
Kaiserslautern D-67653, Germany
e-mail: aschluet@rhrk.uni-kl.de

Charlotte Kuhn

Computational Mechanics,
University of Kaiserslautern,
Kaiserslautern D-67653, Germany
e-mail: chakuhn@rhrk.uni-kl.de

Ralf Müller

Institute of Applied Mechanics,
University of Kaiserslautern,
Kaiserslautern D-67653, Germany
e-mail: ram@rhrk.uni-kl.de

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 20, 2015; final manuscript received July 31, 2016; published online January 30, 2017. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 17(2), 021001 (Jan 30, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: JCISE-15-1422; doi: 10.1115/1.4034385 History: Received December 20, 2015; Revised July 31, 2016

This work presents an approach to simulate laser cutting of ceramic substrates utilizing a phase field model for brittle fracture. To start with, the necessary thermoelastic extension of the original phase field model is introduced. Here, the Beer–Lambert law is used in order to model the effect of the laser on the substrate. The arising system of partial differential equations—which comprises the balance of linear momentum, the energy balance, and the evolution equation that governs crack propagation—is solved by a monolithic finite-element scheme. Finally, the influences of the laser power and the initial groove size on the manufactured work piece are analyzed numerically in simulations of a laser-cutting process.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Body with internal discontinuities (sharp cracks) Γ and (b) approximation of internal discontinuities by a phase field s(x,t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational model and illustration of the Beer–Lambert law. The initial crack is indicated by a dashed line.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contour plots of the order parameter s(x,t) for all the investigated parameter sets (lcrack,I0,max): (a)t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (b) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (c) t = 2.8929 × 10−4 s, (d) t = 2.829 × 10−4 s, (e) t = 2.4152 × 10−4 s, (f)t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (g) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (h) t = 2.6784 × 10−4 s, (i) t = 2.501 × 10−4 s, (j) t = 1.4789 × 10−4 s, (k)t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (l) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (m) t = 2.660 × 10−4 s, (n) t = 2.5220 × 10−4 s, (o) t = 1.3484 × 10−4 s, (p)t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (q) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (r) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (s) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (t) t = 1.3367 × 10−4 s, (u)t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (v) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (w) t = 2.631 × 10−4 s, (x) t = 2.866 × 10−4 s, and (y) t = 1.682 × 10−4 s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Successive crack tip positions and (b) y-coordinate of the crack tip. In this plot, the initial crack length is kept constant at 100% lcrack and only the intensity I0,max is varied.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Elastic energy Ee (a) and fracture Energy Es (b) per unit thickness. In this plot, the initial crack length is kept constant at 100% lcrack and only the intensity I0,max is varied.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effective crack length l¯crack as a function of the beam intensity I0,max and the initial crack length lcrack

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In