Blended Spaces for Integrated Creativity and Play in Design and Engineering Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
Robert E. Wendrich

Rawshaping Technology Laboratory,
Department of Design, Production
and Management,
Faculty of Engineering Technology,
University of Twente,
P.O. Box 217,
Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands
e-mail: r.e.wendrich@utwente.nl;

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 21, 2015; final manuscript received March 18, 2016; published online July 4, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Francesco Ferrise.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 16(3), 030905 (Jul 04, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: JCISE-15-1425; doi: 10.1115/1.4033217 History: Received December 21, 2015; Revised March 18, 2016

The umpire whispers: “Please Play.” We sort of play. But it is all hypothetical, somehow. Even the “we” is theory: I never get quite to see the distant opponent, for all the apparatus of the game (Wallace, 2011, Infinite Jest, Hachette, UK). We find no reason to abandon the notion of play as a distinct and highly important factor in the world's life and doings. All play means something. If we call the active principle that makes up the essence of play, “instinct,” we explain nothing; if we call it “mind” or “will” we say too much. However, we may regard it, the very fact that play has a meaning implies a nonmaterialistic quality in the nature of the thing itself (Huizinga, 2014, Homo Ludens, Ils 86, Routledge, London.). This paper builds on the notion of integration of creativity and play in design and engineering environments. We show results of ongoing research and experimentation with cyber-physical systems (CPS) and multimodal interactions. The use of computational tools for creative processing and idea generation in design and engineering are mostly based on commonly available 2D or 3D CAD programs, applications, and systems. Computer-generated creativity is mostly based on combinatorial power and computational algorithms of the intrinsic system duly orchestrated by the user to manifest outcomes on a variety of processes. However, integrated game-based CPS ecosystems could enhance the uptake of play, imagination, and externalization within the design and engineering process.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Simon, H. A. , and Kaplan, C. A. , 1989, Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
“ Fail Gracefully,” Last modified May 2009, Last accessed Feb. 2016, http://mushon.com/blog/2009/05/05/fail-gracefully/
Kosmadoudi, Z. , Lim, T. , Ritchie, J. , Liu, Y. , Sung, R. , Baalsrud Hauge, J. , Garbaya, S. , Wendrich, R. , and Stanescu, I. , 2013, “ Harmonizing Interoperability - Emergent Serious Gaming in Playful Stochastic CAD Environments,” 2nd International Conference on Games and Learning Alliance (GaLA), pp. 390–399.
Brynjolfsson, E. , and McAfee, A. , 2011, Race Against the Machine, Digital Frontier, Lexington, MA.
Putnam, H. , 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Johnson, M. , 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, UCP, Chicago, IL.
Tversky, B. , 2005, “ Embodied and Disembodied Cognition,” Les Espace de l'Homme Symposium Annuel, A. Berthoz , and R. Recht , eds., Odile Jacob, Paris, pp. 161–184.
Schön, D. A. , 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Vol. 5126, Basic Books, New York.
Brereton, M. , 2004, “ Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating Between Abstract and Material Representations,” Design Representation, Springer, London, pp. 83–103.
Tversky, B. , and Hard, B. M. , 2009, “ Embodied and Disembodied Cognition: Spatial Perspective-Taking,” Cognition, 110(1), pp. 124–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mahon, B. Z. , and Caramazza, A. , 2008, “ A Critical Look at the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis and a New Proposal for Grounding Conceptual Content,” J. Physiol.-Paris, 102(1), pp. 59–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wendrich, R. E. , 2014, “ Mixed Reality Tools for Playful Representation of Ideation, Conceptual Blending and Pastiche in Design and Engineering,” ASME Paper No. DETC2014-34926.
Polanyi, M. , 1966, The Tacit Dimension, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL/London.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2014, “ Hybrid Design Tools For Design and Engineering Processing,” Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Vol. 1, J. Michopoulos , D. Rosen , C. Paredis , and J. Vance , ASME Press, New York, pp. 215–234.
Collins, H. , 2010, Tacit and Explicit Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Spool, J. M. , 2005, “ What Makes a Design Seem ‘Intuitive’?,” User Interface Engineering 10.01, Last modified Jan. 2010, Last accessed Feb. 2016, http://www.uie.com/articles/design_intuitive/
Wendrich, R. E. , 2011, “ Distributed Cognition, Mimic, Representation and Decision Making,” 13th Virtual Reality International Conference (VRIC2011), Laval, France, Apr. 6–8.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2011, “ A Novel Approach for Collaborative Interaction With Mixed Reality in Value Engineering,” ASME Paper No. WINVR2011-5515.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2013, “ The Creative Act is Done on the Hybrid Machine,” DS 75-1: 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 1: Design Processes, Seoul, South Korea, Aug. 19–22, pp. 399–408.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2010, “ Design Tools, Hybridization Exploring Intuitive Interaction,” 16th Eurographics Conference on Virtual Environments and Second Joint Virtual Reality, Eurographics Association, pp. 37–41.
Sellen, A. , and Harper, R. , 2002, The Myth of the Paperless Offices, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Baskinger, M. , 2008, “ Cover Story Pencils Before Pixels: A Primer in Hand-Generated Sketching,” Interactions, 15(2), pp. 28–36. [CrossRef]
Sennett, R. , 2008, The Craftsman, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
McCullough, M. , 1996, Abstracting Craft, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2014, “ Triple Helix Ideation: Comparison of Tools in Early Phase Design Processing,” DS 77: Design 2014, 13th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1229–1238.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2012, “ Multimodal Interaction, Collaboration, and Synthesis in Design and Engineering Processing,” DS 70: Design 2012, the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 579–588.
Wendrich, R. E. , 2015, “ HCI/HMI Pleasure: Push Your Buttons,” DS 80-9 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Vol. 9: User-Centred Design, Design of Socio-Technical Systems, Milan, Italy, Jul. 27–30, pp. 229–238.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. , 1991, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Vol. 41, Harper Perennial, New York.
Shirky, C. , 2010, Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers Into Collaborators, Penguin, London.
Prensky, M. , 2001, “ Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1,” On Horiz., 9(5), pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
Moore, M. R. , “ Adaptation and New Media,” Adaptation (published online).
Hutcheon, L. , 2012, A Theory of Adaptation, Routledge, London.
Macfarlane, R. , 2007, The Wild Places, Penguin, UK, p. 313.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Multimodal user interaction during blindfold experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Setup tacit (L) and tangible (R) cues

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Tacit haptic (L) and tangible haptic (R) representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

End results of tacit and haptic processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Setup blindfold conceptual processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The knowledge gap in human–computer interface design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The four dimensions along which representations can be classified in design processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Transcending structures of bodily experiences

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

HDTE—user-centered design process flow diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

HDTE—continuous challenge between real and virtual representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Various LFDS configurations and embodiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pairwise comparison of HDTE tools: LFDS (top) and NXt-LFDS (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

LFDS versus NXt-LFDS engagement and enjoyment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

LFDS and NXt-LFDS iterative virtual processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Pairwise comparison of LFDS and NXt-LFDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Three-dimensional AM tangible constraint metaphors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Merged end results and iterations/minute on LFDS and NXt-LFDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Iterative ideation galore processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

User interaction test and iterations chart

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Iterations/person on LFDS versus NXt-LFDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

HDT incremental design processing procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Iterated translations and transformations visualized on processing GUI of NXt-LFDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Diagram of fuzzy mode (FM) and logic mode (LM) to afford multimodal interaction with LFDS-HDTs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Choice and decision making of iterations from fuzzy mode (FM) (top) in review pane of logic mode (LM) (bottom) on GUI of NXt-LFDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Final results selection iterations in fuzzy mode (top) and tagged selections (bottom) on GUI of NXt-LFDS




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In