0
Research Papers

Efficient Contact Modeling in Nonrigid Variation Simulation

[+] Author and Article Information
Björn Lindau

Department 81720, Geopl. PVÖE 101,
Volvo Cars,
Göteborg SE-405 31, Sweden
e-mail: bjorn.lindau@volvocars.com

Samuel Lorin

Mem. ASME
Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre for
Industrial Mathematics,
Chalmers University of Technology
Chalmers Science Park,
Göteborg SE-412 88, Sweden
e-mail: samuel.lorin@fcc.chalmers.se

Lars Lindkvist

Associate Professor
Department of Product and
Production Development,
Chalmers University of Technology,
Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden
e-mail: lali@chalmers.se

Rikard Söderberg

Mem. ASME
Professor
Department of Product and
Production Development,
Chalmers University of Technology,
Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden
e-mail: rikard.soderberg@chalmers.se

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 18, 2014; final manuscript received November 7, 2015; published online January 4, 2016. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 16(1), 011002 (Jan 04, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: JCISE-14-1284; doi: 10.1115/1.4032077 History: Received September 18, 2014; Revised November 07, 2015

Virtual tools and methods are becoming increasingly important in order to predict the geometric outcome in early phases of the product realization process. Method of influence coefficients (MIC) in combination with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is a well-known technique that can be used in nonrigid variation simulation. In these simulations, contact modeling is important to ensure a correct result. Contact modeling simulates how mating surfaces are hindered from penetrating each other, giving rise to contact forces that contribute to the deformation of the parts when assembled and the final shape of the subassembly after springback. These contact forces have to be taken into consideration in each MCS-iteration. To secure reasonable response times, the calculation of the contact forces needs to be fast. In this paper, we formulate a quadratic programming (QP) problem to solve the contact problem. The case studies presented show that node-based contact modeling can be efficiently solved through QP.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Söderberg, R. , Lindkvist, L. , and Dahlström, S. , 2006, “ Computer-Aided Robustness Analysis for Compliant Assemblies,” ASME J. Eng. Des., 17(5), pp. 411–428.
Dahlström, S. , 2005, “ Variation Simulation of Sheet Metal Assemblies for Geometrical Quality, Parameter Modeling and Analysis,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Wärmefjord, K. , 2011, “ Variation Control in Virtual Product Realization—A Statistical Approach,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Söderberg, R. , and Carlson, J. S. , 1999, “ Locating Scheme Analysis for Robust Assembly and Fixture Design,” ASME Paper No. DETC99/DAC-86901999.
Segeborn, J. , 2011, “ Cost-Effective Sheet Metal Assembly by Automatic Path Planning and Line Balancing, Integrated With Dimensional Variation Analysis,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Liu, S. C. , and Hu, S. J. , 1997, “ Variation Simulation for Deformable Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Finite Element Methods,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 119(3), pp. 368–374. [CrossRef]
Hu, S. J. , and Wu, S. M. , 1992, “ Identifying Sources of Variation in Automobile Body Assembly Using Principal Component Analysis,” Trans. NAMRI/SME, 20, pp. 311–316.
Camelio, J. A. , Hu, S. J. , and Ceglarek, D. , 2003, “ Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly Systems With Compliant Parts,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(4), pp. 673–681. [CrossRef]
Camelio, J. A. , Hu, S. J. , and Marin, S. P. , 2004, “ Compliant Assembly Variation Analysis Using Component Geometric Covariance,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 126(2), pp. 355–360. [CrossRef]
Liu, Y. G. , and Hu, S. J. , 2005, “ Assembly Fixture Fault Diagnosis Using Designated Component Analysis,” Trans. ASME, 127(2), pp. 358–368. [CrossRef]
Camelio, J. A. , and Yim, H. , 2006, “ Identification of Dimensional Variation Patterns on Compliant Assemblies,” J. Manuf. Syst., 25(2), pp. 65–76. [CrossRef]
Camelio, J. A. , Hu, S. J. , and Zhong, W. P. , 2004, “ Diagnosis of Multiple Fixture Faults in Machining Processes Using Designated Component Analysis,” J. Manuf. Syst., 23(4), pp. 309–315. [CrossRef]
Conry, T. F. , and Seireg, A. , 1971, “ A Mathematical Programming Method for Design of Elastic Bodies in Contact,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 38(2), pp. 387–392. [CrossRef]
Dahlström, S. , and Lindkvist, L. , 2007, “ Variation Simulation of Sheet Metal Assemblies Using the Method of Influence Coefficients With Contact Modeling,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(3), pp. 615–622. [CrossRef]
Wärmefjord, K. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2009, “ Tolerance Simulation of Compliant Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Automatic Node-Based Contact Detection,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2008-66344.
Ungemach, G. , and Mantwill, F. , 2009, “ Efficient Consideration of Contact in Compliant Assembly Variation Analysis,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 131(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Xie, K. , Wells, L. , Camelio, J. A. , and Youn, B. D. , 2007, “ Variation Propagation Analysis on Compliant Assemblies Considering Contact Interaction,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(5), pp. 934–942. [CrossRef]
Wolfe, P. , 1959, “ The Simplex Method for Quadratic Programming,” Econometrica, 27(3), pp. 382–398. [CrossRef]
Dantzig, G. B. , 1998, Linear Programming and Extensions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Nanda, A. P. , and Mannfolk, S. , 2014, “ Heat Dependent Squeak & Rattle Simulation Using the E-Line Method in Combination With Variation Simulation,” Master thesis, Department of Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Weber, J. , Sabiniarz, P. , Wickman, C. , Lindqvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2013, “ Squeak & Rattle Simulation at Volvo Car Corporation Using the E-LINE Method,” 5th ANSA & μETA International Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 5–7.
Weber, J. , and Benhayoun, I. , 2012, “ Squeak & Rattle Correlation in Time Domain Using the SAR-LINE Method,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst., 5(3), pp. 1124–1132.
Weber, J. , and Benhayoun, I. , 2011, “ Squeak & Rattle Simulation—A Success Enabler in the Development of the New Saab 9-5 Cockpit Without Prototype Hardware,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars Mech. Syst., 3(1), pp. 936–947.
RD&T, 2011, RD&T Manual, Version 1.13, Göteborg, Sweden.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variation simulation based on MIC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contact modeling in combination with MIC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contact modeling definitions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Simulated sheet metal assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot showing the initial part deviation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Defined weld points and the locators scheme for springback calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Rattle and squeak model, center-panel

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In