0
Research Papers

Comparison of Analysis Line and Polytopes Methods to Determine the Result of a Tolerance Chain

[+] Author and Article Information
Laurent Pierre

LURPA,
ENS Cachan,
University of Paris-Sud,
61, av. du Président Wilson,
Cachan Cedex 94235, France
e-mail: laurent.pierre@lurpa.ens-cachan.fr

Bernard Anselmetti

LURPA,
ENS Cachan,
University of Paris-Sud,
61, av. du Président Wilson,
Cachan Cedex 94235, France
e-mail: Bernard.anselmetti@lurpa.ens-cachan.fr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received October 6, 2014; final manuscript received October 29, 2014; published online April 8, 2015. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 15(2), 021007 (Jun 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: JCISE-14-1317; doi: 10.1115/1.4029049 History: Received October 06, 2014; Revised October 29, 2014; Online April 08, 2015

Functional tolerancing must ensure the assembly and the functioning of a mechanism. This paper compares two methods of tolerance analysis of a mechanical system: the method of “analysis lines” and the method of “polytopes.” The first method needs a discretization of the ending functional surface according to various analysis lines placed on the outer-bound of the face and oriented along the normal of the surface. The second method uses polytopes. The polytopes are defined from the acceptable limits of the geometric deviations of parts and possible displacements between two parts. Minkowski sums and intersections polytopes are then carried out to take into account all geometric variations of a mechanism.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Setting-up table of the cover on the housing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

ISO tolerancing of both parts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Assembling requirement of the shaft

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Main specifications

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Discretization in eight analysis directions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Straightness between two different parts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Influence of the cover

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Influence of junction housing/cover

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Geometric polytope D1,1/ABg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Geometric polytope D1,1/Ag

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Global geometric polytope D1,1/ABg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Geometric polytope D2,1/CDg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Polytope of contact DAB/CDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Inclusion of the calculated polytope D1,1/2,1 in the functional polytope D1,1/2,1f

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In