0
Research Papers

Experimental Study of an Airplane Accident Evacuation/Rescue Simulation Using Three-Dimensional Kinematic Digital Human Models

[+] Author and Article Information
Takao Kakizaki

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Nihon University,
Nakagawara 1, Tokusada, Tamura,
Koriyama, Fukushima 963-8642, Japan
e-mail: kakizaki@mech.ce.nihon-u.ac.jp

Mitsuru Endo

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Nihon University,
Nakagawara 1, Tokusada, Tamura,
Koriyama, Fukushima 963-8642, Japan
e-mail: m_endo@mech.ce.nihon-u.ac.jp

Jiro Urii

CAS Research,
44-4-105 Shimo,
Fussa City, Tokyo 197-0023, Japan
e-mail: Jiro.URII@cas.fussa.tokyo.jp

Contributed by the Computers and Information Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 6, 2014; final manuscript received December 9, 2014; published online April 9, 2015. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 15(3), 031006 (Sep 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: JCISE-14-1362; doi: 10.1115/1.4029563 History: Received November 06, 2014; Revised December 09, 2014; Online April 09, 2015

The 3D mass evacuation simulation of an airplane accident is experimentally verified. Evacuee motion has been experimentally investigated by building a test field that emulates the interior of an actual regional airliner with a capacity of approximately 100 passengers. The experiment results indicate that the evacuation time tends to be affected by the number of passengers and the evacuee guidance at the emergency exit. The results also indicate that any evacuation delay in exiting by individual passengers only slightly affects the total evacuation time because of evacuee congestion in the aisles. Moreover, the importance of evacuation guidance notification was investigated based on the evacuation-order variance. Finally, the experimental results were compared to the corresponding simulation results. Simulations using appropriate evacuee walking speeds can provide valid evacuation times, which are the most important factor in designing evacuation drills. Consequently, these results should be applied to existing 3D simulations using precise kinematic digital human (KDH) models for more accurate mass evacuation/rescue simulations.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Evacuation drill for an airplane accident in Japan. (reprinted with permission from the KitaNippon Shimbun).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

KDH model and its joint arrangements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Joint coordinate frames in the KDH model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

KDH model of two stretcher-bearers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Carrying a stretcher down a stairway

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Case of four stretcher-bearers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

3D model of the entire airport

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

3D model of an airliner and its coordinate frame

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Models of emergency vehicles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Emergency vehicle deployment path

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Typical scene of passenger evacuation (98 s after start)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Typical scene of evacuation/rescue operation (95 s after start)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) A photograph of the interior of a CRJ regional jet airliner (manufactured by Bombardier), (b) experimental mockup of an airliner interior

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Experiment field setup on campus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Measured evacuation times for each experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Evacuation times for different numbers of passengers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Evacuation times for self-evacuation and evacuation with guidance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Number of passengers Ne (measuring evacuation-order deviation frequencies) for case 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Comparison of the evacuation of passengers from predetermined seat positions to the actual evacuation order for case 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Number of passengers Ne (measuring escape order deviation frequencies) for case 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Comparison of the evacuation of passengers from predetermined seat positions to the actual evacuation order for case 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Experimental results and corresponding simulation results (a) 0 s, (b) 5 s, (c) 30 s, (d) 60 s, (e) 90 s, and (f) completed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Photograph of an evacuation drill being conducted (180 s after start)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Simulation of the evacuation shown in Fig. 23 (180 s after start)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In