Research Papers

Combining Variation Simulation With Thermal Expansion Simulation for Geometry Assurance

[+] Author and Article Information
Rikard Söderberg

Department of Product and
Production Development,
Chalmers University of Technology,
Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden

Robert Sandboge

Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre for
Industrial Mathematics,
Chalmers Science Park,
Gothenburg SE-412 88, Sweden

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. Manuscript received February 28, 2013; final manuscript received April 24, 2013; published online July 22, 2013. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 13(3), 031007 (Jul 22, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: JCISE-13-1032; doi: 10.1115/1.4024655 History: Received February 28, 2013; Revised April 24, 2013

In every set of assembled products, there are geometrical variations and deviations from nominal dimensions. This can lead to products that are difficult to assemble or products not fulfilling functional or aesthetical requirements. In several industries, variation simulation is used to predict assembly variation in the development phase. This analysis is usually done under room temperature conditions only. However, for some materials, such as plastics, the thermal expansion can be significant in the intended environmental span of the product. In an assembly, this can lead to thermal stresses and parts that will deform. To avoid this problem, locating schemes need to be designed to allow for the right behavior while exposed to varying temperatures. In this work, the effect of thermal expansion is studied in the context of variation simulation. A virtual tool for this purpose is also presented. Two case studies from the automotive industry are used where the combined effect of thermal expansion and assembly variation is analyzed. It is shown that it may not be sufficient to simply add the result from thermal analysis to assembly variation. Hence, to assure the geometrical and functional quality of assembled products during usage variation simulations need to be combined with thermal expansion simulation.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Maropoulos, P. G., and Ceglarek, D., 2010, “Design Verification and Validation in Product Lifecycle,” CIRP Ann., 52(2), pp. 740–759. [CrossRef]
Söderberg, R., Lindkvist, L., and Carlson, J., “Virtual Geometry Assurence for Effective Product Realisation,” Proceedings of First Nordic Conference on Product Lifecycle Management-NordPLM'06.
Lorin, S., Forslund, K., and Söderberg, R., “Investigating the Role of Simulation for Robust Plastic Design,” Proceedings of Norddesign.
Söderberg, R., Lindkvist, L., and Dahlström, S., 2006, “Computer-Aided Robustness Analysis for Compliant Assemblies,” J. Eng. Design, 17(5), pp. 411–428. [CrossRef]
Söderberg, R., and Carlson, J., “Locating Scheme Analysis for Robust Assembly and Fixture Design,” Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences.
Huang, M. S., and Lin, T. Y., 2008, “An Innovative Regression Model-Based Searching Method for Setting the Robust Injection Molding Parameters,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 198(1–3), pp. 436–444. [CrossRef]
Chen, C.-P., Chuang, M.-T., Hsiao, Y.-H., Yang, Y.-K., and Tsai, C.-H., 2009, “Simulation and Experimental Study in Determining Injection Molding Process Parameters for Thin-Shell Plastic Parts Via Design of Experiments Analysis,” Expert Sys. Applic., 36(7), pp. 10752–10759. [CrossRef]
Ozcelik, B., and Erzurumlu, T., 2006, “Comparison of the Warpage Optimization in the Plastic Injection Molding Using ANOVA, Neural Network Model and Genetic Algorithm,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 171(3), pp. 437–445. [CrossRef]
Oktem, H., Erzurumlu, T., and Uzman, I., 2007, “Application of Taguchi Optimization Technique in Determining Plastic Injection Molding Process Parameters for a Thin Shell Part,” Mater. Des., 28(4), pp. 1271–1278. [CrossRef]
Tang, S. H., Tan, Y. J., Sapuan, S. M., Sulaiman, S., Ismail, N., and Samin, R., 2007, “The Use of Taguchi Method in the Design of Plastic Injection Mould for Reducing Warpage,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 182, pp. 418–426. [CrossRef]
Kazmer, D., and Roser, C., 1999, “Evaluation of Product and Process Design Robustness,” Res. Eng. Des., 11(1), pp. 20–30. [CrossRef]
Liu, S. C., and Hu, S. J., 1997, “Variation Simulation for Deformable Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Finite Element Methods,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 119, pp. 368–374. [CrossRef]
Camelio, J. A., Hu, J. S., and Ceglarek, D., 2003, “Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly System With Compliant Parts,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(4), pp. 673–681. [CrossRef]
Camelio, J. A., Hu, J. S., and Ceglarek, D., 2002, “Impact of Fixture Design on Sheet Metal Assembly Variation,” J. Manuf. Syst., 23(3), pp. 182–192. [CrossRef]
Wärmefjord, K., Lindkvist, L., and Söderberg, R., “Tolerance Simulation of Compliant Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Automatic Node-Based Contact Detection,” Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition.
Dahlström, S., and Lindkvist, L., 2004, “Variation Simulation of Sheet Metal Assemblies Using the Method of Influencing Coefficient With Contact Modeling,” Proceedings of ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relations between displacements, strain and stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A 3-2-1 positioning system often used for rigid bodies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometrical robustness studied at different levels of plastic design [3]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

As a case study, the combined effect of thermal expansion and variation is studied on a plastic appliqué on the rear end of an automobile. The appliqué is the component under the rear windshield.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Above, 6 standard deviations (mm) in x-direction in 20 °C. The circles are displaying the position of the additional support points to hinder expansion in the y-direction. Below are 6 standard deviations in 90 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mean shift in x-direction (mm) caused by thermal expansion while hindered to expand in y-direction. The temperature is 90 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The distribution of the gap measure at 90 °C when the appliqué is hindered to expand in the y-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The position of 4 measures, to measure mean shift and variation in the x-direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Above, the result of thermal expansion for 4 measures where 6 standard deviations have been added as vertical bars from a variation simulation. Below, thermal expansion and variation simulated combined

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The gap between the appliqué and rear lamp is one critical measure that is of interest in different temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The result of the critical gap measure after 1000 MC-runs. Above, the temperature is −30 °C, in the middle 20 °C and below 90 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Above, the instantiation resulting in the maximal gap for the temperature −30 °C and below, the minimum gap in 90 °C between the appliqué (right) and the rear lamp (left)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In