0
Research Papers

Emerging Design Methods and Tools in Collaborative Product Development

[+] Author and Article Information
Edward Red

e-mail: ered@byu.edu

David French

e-mail: davidfrench11@gmail.com

Gregory Jensen

e-mail: cjensen@byu.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602

Sheli Sillito Walker

e-mail: sheli.sillito@byu.edu

Peter Madsen

e-mail: petermadsen@byu.edu
Organizational Behavior,
Marriott School of Management,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. Manuscript received October 11, 2012; final manuscript received February 25, 2013; published online April 25, 2013. Editor: Bahram Ravani.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 13(3), 031001 (Apr 25, 2013) (14 pages) Paper No: JCISE-12-1183; doi: 10.1115/1.4023917 History: Received October 11, 2012; Revised February 25, 2013

Product development uses the engineering design process to conceptualize and design new products, while relying on computer-aided application tools like CAD/CAE/CAM that are unfortunately designed for single users. In the absence of multiuser engineering applications, this paper uses surveys and facility visits to show an increased reliance on social communication tools for closing design collaboration feedback loops. Product development requires collaboration among myriad personnel and organizations, each having unique complementary experiences and capabilities. Collaborative design has a primary goal: reduce time-to-market and competitive costs for new products, while retaining quality of product performance and minimizing environmental impact. The focus of this paper is to compare contemporary methods and tools used in collaborative product design at notable corporations to emerging multiuser computer-aided applications. This comparison will define a future where design mistakes and time-to-market are reduced, collaboration is not only truly concurrent, but simultaneously concurrent, and where design rationale is more easily captured and shared for later review and for educational training.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

e-Handbook ontology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

e-Handbook Ontology expanded

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effectiveness by company

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effectiveness by contribution type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Formal meetings inefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Communication tools

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NX Connect architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Database relationship diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

NX Connect front frame design session with three clients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Geometric constraint limiting of user feature selection

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

CUBIT Connect interfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Sketching/revolving the middle rim

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Apply ten instances of extruded boss

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Sketching fin boss

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Sketching/revolving the middle rim

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Revolved shaft and client additions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Sketch plane cross section of shaft

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

CUBIT Connect session

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

CUBIT Connect CS architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Named pipes connections

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In