0
Technical Briefs

A Moving Base Simulator Investigation of Effects of a Yaw Stability System Caused by a Side Impact

[+] Author and Article Information
Anders Andersson, Jonas Jansson

 The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Olaus Magnus väg 35, SE-583 30 Linköping, Swedenanders.andersson@vti.se

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 11(4), 044501 (Nov 28, 2011) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3647871 History: Received January 15, 2010; Revised June 28, 2011; Published November 28, 2011; Online November 28, 2011

The main objective of this study was to investigate how an electronic stability control (ESC) system may aid the driver in a critical sideswipe accident. Another objective was to investigate the possibility of having a realistic simulation of a sideswipe accident in a large moving base simulator. The experiment can be divided into two parts. In part one, the driver is unaware of the sudden side impact and in part two, the side impact was repeated six times. The experiment was driven by 18 persons. With the ESC system active no driver lost control, while with the system inactive there were five drivers that lost control in part one. In part two, the ESC system showed to stabilize the vehicle faster, and the improvement in stabilization time was between 40% and 62%. It was also seen that 2% loss of control occurred with an ESC system active and 45% without.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Side view of SIM-3

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Hysteresis of limited control error

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Sine with dwell maneuver without an active ESC system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Sine with dwell maneuver with an active ESC system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Implemented impulse compared to a more realistic

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

A snapshot of the environment from the first part of the scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Logged stabilization time from part one

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Percentual benefits from part two of the study

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In