Technical Briefs

Proactive Assembly Oriented Design Approach Based on the Deployment of Functional Requirements

[+] Author and Article Information
Frédéric Demoly

Computer-Aided Design and Production Laboratory (LICP), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), EPFL STI IGM LICP, ME A1 380, Station 9, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerlandfrederic.demoly@epfl.ch

Nadège Troussier, Benoît Eynard

Roberval Laboratory, CNRS 6253, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, BP 60319, Rue du Docteur Schweitzer, 60203 Compiègne Cedex, Francenadege.troussier@utc.fr

Hugo Falgarone, Benoît Fricero

EADS Innovation Works, European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, 12 rue Pasteur, 92150 Suresnes, Francehugo.falgarone@eads.net

Samuel Gomes

Mechatronics, Methods, and Skill Laboratory (M3M), Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard (UTBM), 90010 Belfort Cedex, Francesamuel.gomes@utbm.fr

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 11(1), 014501 (Mar 31, 2011) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3570572 History: Received March 25, 2010; Revised December 14, 2010; Published March 31, 2011; Online March 31, 2011

Concurrent engineering and integrated design have been a major issue over the past two decades especially considering design for X stakes. This paper describes a new proposal of integrated product-process design approach in order to improve the efficiency and the robustness of the assembly process planning phase. The proposed method illustrates how to consider functional requirements and technical constraints as early as possible to improve design principles and define the best assembly sequences fulfilling these requirements. Lastly, the proposed research is applied on an aeronautic case study for illustrating the potential benefits of such an approach in terms of taking account of assembly knowledge in the early product development stages.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Maximum gap (a) and minimum overlap and (b) between upper and lower shells

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Implementation of the PASODE approach

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Process flowchart describing the proposed PASODE approach

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Oriented graph G representing relational constraints between product components

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Oriented graph G and the related cDOF

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

DM08 fuselage section assembly considered for the experimentation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In