0
Research Papers

Geometry of Signed Point-to-Surface Distance Function and Its Application to Surface Approximation

[+] Author and Article Information
Li Min Zhu1

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P.R. Chinazhulm@sjtu.edu.cn

Xiao Ming Zhang, You Lun Xiong

State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P.R. China

Han Ding

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P.R. China

1

Corresponding author.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 10(4), 041003 (Nov 23, 2010) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3510588 History: Received July 16, 2009; Revised June 29, 2010; Published November 23, 2010; Online November 23, 2010

This paper presents a unified framework for computing a surface to approximate a target shape defined by discrete data points. A signed point-to-surface distance function is defined, and its properties are investigated, especially, its second-order Taylor approximant is derived. The intercorrelations between the signed and the squared distance functions are clarified, and it is demonstrated that the squared distance function studied in the previous works is just the Type I squared distance function deduced from the signed distance function. It is also shown that surface approximations under different criteria and constraints can all be formulated as optimization problems with specified requirements on the residual errors represented by the signed distance functions, and that classical numerical optimization algorithms can be directly applied to solve them since the derivatives of the involved objective functions and constraint functions are all available. Examples of global cutter position optimization for flank milling of ruled surface with a cylindrical tool, which requires approximating the tool envelope surface to the point cloud on the design surface following the minimum zone criterion, are given to confirm the validity of the proposed approach.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Point-to-surface distance function

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Relationships among the distance functions discussed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Tool axis trajectory surface represented as a ruled surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Distribution of the geometric errors before optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Distribution of the geometric errors after optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Surface model of a blade of an impeller

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Interference between the tool envelope surface and the design surface before optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Interference between the tool envelope surface and the design surface after optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Synthetic point cloud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Root mean squared error versus the number of iterations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Reconstructed ruled surface

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In