Research Papers

Engineering Complex, Information-Based, Networked Industrial Systems: A Research Roadmap

[+] Author and Article Information
Albert Jones

National Institute of Standards and Technologyalbert.jones@nist.govTexas A&M Universityalbert.jones@nist.govPennsylvania State Universityalbert.jones@nist.govIC Focus, Ltd.albert.jones@nist.gov

Abhijit Deshmukh

National Institute of Standards and Technologydeshmukh@iemail.tamu.eduTexas A&M Universitydeshmukh@iemail.tamu.eduPennsylvania State Universitydeshmukh@iemail.tamu.eduIC Focus, Ltd.deshmukh@iemail.tamu.edu

Soundar Kumara

National Institute of Standards and Technologyskumara@psu.eduTexas A&M Universityskumara@psu.eduPennsylvania State Universityskumara@psu.eduIC Focus, Ltd.skumara@psu.edu

Man-Sze Li

National Institute of Standards and Technologymsli@icfocis.co.ukTexas A&M Universitymsli@icfocis.co.ukPennsylvania State Universitymsli@icfocis.co.ukIC Focus, Ltd.msli@icfocis.co.uk

Agrippa may have been one of the earliest to recognize this http://www.hermetic.com/sabazius/agrippa.htm.











J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 8(1), 011005 (Feb 28, 2008) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2844398 History: Received April 11, 2007; Revised January 18, 2008; Published February 28, 2008

The explosive pace of globalization and the rapid development of information and communications technologies continue to impact the evolution of industrial systems. They have become completely dependent on information—generating, exchanging, and processing far more electronic data than ever before. They have become geographically dispersed organizations that comprise numerous, tightly interconnected networks of diverse companies. As a result, current-day industrial systems exhibit highly nonlinear, chaotic, and unpredictable behaviors. How best to engineer these new systems is a question of both theoretical and practical importance. Albert Einstein believed that you cannot use old approaches to solve new, and fundamentally different, problems. (“We cannot solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”) That old approach, Descartes’ reductionism, said that you could infer the behavior of the entire system by knowing only the behavior of its components. This view is not valid for these new systems, because their behavior emerges in complex ways from the interactions of those components. Therefore, in this paper, we argue that a different approach to engineering these new types of industrial systems is needed. We base that approach on our view that these systems are remarkably similar to living systems. In this paper, we describe the major characteristics of living systems, summarize their similarities with these new systems, and use these similarities as a basis for a new research agenda.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Multiscale, three-level decomposition of large disaster management system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Behavior based on eigenvalues

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Two phase-space orbits that do not converge

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Implementation of Rule 30

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Physical layout of example shop

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

State transition graph for example shop

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Different starting points can lead to different solutions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Conceptual model of E2ESU



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In