0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Methods and Artifacts for Comparison of Scanning CMM Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Sami A. Farooqui, Edward P. Morse

Center for Precision Metrology, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 7(1), 72-80 (Jan 22, 2007) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2709928 History: Received September 19, 2005; Revised January 22, 2007

Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) with continuous-contact scanning capabilities are experiencing more and more use in a wide variety of discrete-part manufacturing industries. Many users of these CMMs, if asked, will say that their metrology requirements include high density scans at high speeds with high accuracy. These requirements are in conflict, as there will be some point at which the accuracy of the scanned data begins to decrease with an increase in the scanning speed. This paper addresses the effects of scanning speed on the performance of different CMMs using contact sensors. The use of a family of artifacts is proposed in order to evaluate the relative scanning performance as a function of scanning speed and the direction of the scan within the CMM volume. The artifacts that are developed for these tests have a sinusoidal waveform superimposed on a flat surface. This paper describes a series of experiments that utilize these artifacts and assess the ability of these tests to capture how a scanning CMM will perform when measuring actual parts.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Sinusoidal artifacts: linear (top), high-amplitude (left), and low-amplitude (right) artifacts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Linear sinusoidal artifact

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Deviations from LS sine wave (data from Talysurf 120L with 1μm point density)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Deviations from LS sine wave for different scanning speeds (data from CMM)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of scans on low-amplitude sine disk scanned on two different CMMs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Scans in the x direction with 2mm∕s, 5mm∕s, 8mm∕s, 10mm∕s scanning speed compared to the reference scan

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Comparison of a 20mm∕s scan in x direction with the reference scan

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Deviations from LS sine wave for 2mm∕s scan in xyz direction

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

High-amplitude disk scanned on CMM 4, along different directions and at different speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Simulated plot comparing different CMMs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Target scan planes on the test sphere per ISO 10360-4

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Performance of two CMMs in measuring the low-amplitude sine disk

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Effect of speed while scanning the high-amplitude sine disk

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of scans on linear artifact scanned on CMM 3

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Scans in xy (with spike near middle) and xyz direction (with undulations) compared to the reference scan (scanning speed: 1mm∕s)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In