A Survey of Structural Optimization in Mechanical Product Development

[+] Author and Article Information
Kazuhiro Saitou1

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Kazuhiro Izui, Shinji Nishiwaki

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics,  Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Panos Papalambros

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan


Corresponding author.

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 5(3), 214-226 (Sep 01, 2005) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2013290 History:

The widespread availability of affordable high-performance personal computers and commercial software has prompted the integration of structural analyses with numerical optimization, reducing the need for design iterations by human designers. Despite its acceptance as a design tool, however, structural optimization seems yet to gain mainstream popularity in industry. To remedy this situation, this paper reviews past literatures on structural optimization with emphasis on their relation to mechanical product development, and discusses open research issues that would further enhance the industry acceptance of structural optimization. The past literatures are categorized based on their major research focuses: geometry parameterization, approximation methods, optimization algorithms, and the integration with nonstructural issues. Open problems in each category and anticipated future trends briefly are discussed.

Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Types of geometry parameterization: (a) sizing, (b) shape, and (c) topology (5)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Two approaches for structural topology optimization. (a) Discrete element (ground structure), and (b) continuum.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

3D topology optimization with frame and panel elements (64). (a) Design domain, and (b) optimal panel configuration.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

(a) Finite element, (b) lumped parameter, and (c) equivalent mechanism models of a vehicle front subframe (153)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Equiavlent mechanism model of vehicle front half-body (155). Boxlike outlines are shown only to provide a visual clue to human designers.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Optimization result of cross-sectional shape of automotive body frame using genetic algorithm (192)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Pareto-optimal multicomponent topologies of a simplified automotive floor frame subject to multiple loading conditions, considering stiffness, manufacturability, and assembleability (236)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) Automotive space frame optimally decomposed for overall stiffness, component manufacturability, and the adjustability of dimensions K1–K5 during assembly process, and (b) the corresponding assembly sequence to realize the adjustability (237)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Number of conference and journal papers (written in English) in Compendex between 1980 and 2004 with classification code 6* and containing “structural optimization” and “product development” in subject, title, or abstract




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In