Ontologies for Integrating Engineering Applications

[+] Author and Article Information
Mihai Ciocoiu, Dana S. Nau

Department of Computer Science and Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742

Michael Gruninger

Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742

J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 1(1), 12-22 (Nov 01, 2000) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1344878 History: Received August 01, 2000; Revised November 01, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Information exchange among subsystems for concurrent engineering
Grahic Jump Location
A common ontology drastically reduces the number of translators needed
Grahic Jump Location
In this example, interoperability cannot be achieved simply by sharing terminology, because the term “resource” has different meanings in each application. Interoperability will require translation to be based on explicit definitions of the terms.
Grahic Jump Location
Part (a) is a taxonomic hierarchy of some of the categories 4 from an early version of Cyc. Part (b) shows a possible set of axioms one might use to represent this taxonomic hierarchy.
Grahic Jump Location
By explicitly providing definitions, the terminology of one application can be mapped to the terminology of the other application so that semantics are preserved
Grahic Jump Location
The KIF axioms from PSL-Core that axiomatize intuitions about time
Grahic Jump Location
An example translation from IDEF3 to ILOG using PSL




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In